Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/T_ci7BsKcFQ/using-science-for-optimal-gravy-coverage
conversion disorder the chronicle spinal stenosis the forgotten man mike jones just friends chronicle
Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/T_ci7BsKcFQ/using-science-for-optimal-gravy-coverage
conversion disorder the chronicle spinal stenosis the forgotten man mike jones just friends chronicle
Margaret Snopkowski, 51, of Michigan, missed the birth of her first grandchild Oct. 24. Instead, she was hospitalized 300 miles away as fungal meningitis from tainted back pain drugs ravaged her system. Congressional committees this week are probing the outbreak that has killed 32.
Source: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036697/vp/49796234#49796234
kyle williams florida debate rand paul mark kirk florida gop debate freddie mac kristin cavallari
LAKE BUENA VISTA, Fla. (AP) ? Charlie Beljan was worried about keeping his PGA Tour card when he showed up at Disney for the final tournament of the year. That changed Friday over five frightening hours when he felt a shortness of breath and his heart racing, and eventually told his caddie that he thought he was going to die.
His chest heaved. He called for paramedics at the turn and was told his blood pressure was not good. He sat in the middle of the fairway to rest and kneeled on the green to try to steady himself.
In one of the most remarkable rounds of the year, the 28-year-old rookie fought through it for an 8-under 64 to take a three-shot lead.
Moments after signing his card, Beljan was loaded onto a stretcher. His eyes were shut, his head tilted back ? still wearing his visor ? and his arms were folded across his stomach as paramedics loaded him into an ambulance parked beyond the 18th green at the Palm Course.
"I think he was scared," said his caddie, Rick Adcox. "He kept saying he thought he was going to die. He just had that feeling. I don't know why. But it was spooky."
A few hours later, his agent sent a text to PGA Tour officials from Celebration Hospital that Beljan was waiting on tests, feeling better and hopeful of being discharged from the hospital Friday evening. In a later text, agent Andy Dawson said even if Beljan remained in the hospital overnight, he still planned to play the third round.
Beljan was in the lead for the first time after any round going into the weekend at the Children's Miracle Network Hospitals Classic. It could not have come at a better time because he is No. 139 on the money list, and only the top 125 keep their full cards for next year.
The tour said Beljan complained of an elevated heart rate, shortness of breath and heart palpitations. Adcox said Beljan told him of numbness in his arms and he felt like he was going to faint.
"I thought they were going to stop him on 10 when they told him what the blood pressure was," he said. "He just said, 'I'm going to keep going until either I pass out or they take me off.' I kept saying, 'It doesn't matter to me. It's only a golf tournament. You've got many more.'"
The struggle was painfully clear the way Beljan constantly stooped over with his hands on his knees, backed off shots and tried to take deep breaths. That he wound up in the lead at 12-under 132 was simply amazing.
"It was bizarre," said Edward Loar, who played with Beljan. "I don't know if he thought he was going to make it. It sure didn't affect his golf. I heard him call for a paramedic on No. 9. Before the round, he said he was having a hard time breathing. Hopefully, the guy was all right. He was having a hard time breathing in there."
Beljan had a three-shot lead over seven players, including Henrik Stenson, Harris English, Charles Howell III and first-round leader Charlie Wi. He likely would need to finish in about 10th place to move into the top 125 and keep a job for next year ? assuming he can even play.
Golf didn't seem to be a big priority across from the Magic Kingdom, and there were concerns Beljan would even finish his round.
"I thought a lot of times he was going to stop," Adcox said. "I didn't even think he was going to start. He asked me to go find a doctor at the beginning, and I did. The paramedics ... were on No. 10 waiting on him. Blood pressure wasn't good then. For him to go on, that was pretty much his decision.
When he did get over a shot, the outcome generally was superb.
"He hit four of the best iron shots I've seen on the par 5s," Loar said. "It was awesome to watch."
Adcox realized something wasn't right when Beljan called for a doctor on the practice range. He drilled his long second shot onto the green at the par-5 first hole, and when the caddie handed him a putter, he said Beljan told him, "I don't feel very good."
"He got up there and made the eagle and still said he didn't feel good," Adcox said. "It's been not good all day. The score was good."
The caddie said they didn't pay attention to the score Beljan was putting together, and because they were playing on the Palm Course that doesn't have many leaderboards, they didn't even know Beljan was in the lead until the round was over.
They simply started a countdown ? one more hole, one more shot.
Beljan had two eagles and played the par 5s in 6 under. He struggled to finish, picking up a bogey on the 17th and missing the green to the right on the 18th. Facing a difficult chip, made even tougher that he looked wobbly over the ball, he hit a beautiful shot to 4 feet to save par.
The final two rounds move to the tougher Magnolia Course, which effectively feels like the final stage of Q-school for some of the players. Matt Jones and Mark Anderson, in that group at 9-under 135, can avoid going to the second stage of Q-school. Wi needs a win to have any hope of getting into the Masters. English is going for his first win.
Rod Pampling will have to sweat out his future at home in Dallas for the second straight year. He is No. 124 on the money list, made bogeys on the 16th and 17th holes and missed the cut by one shot. All that helps Pampling is that Billy Mayfair, who is No. 125 on the money list, also missed the cut, as did Gary Christian at No. 127.
Kevin Chappell was at No. 123, but he put together another solid round and suddenly is only four shots out of the lead. His card would appear to be safe.
Source: http://news.yahoo.com/beljan-nearly-passes-way-lead-233400691--spt.html
end of the world 2012 pink martini times square 2012 predictions new years eve ball drop new years eve times square 2012 2012 holidays
Richard Atkin is president of Sunquest Information Systems of Tucson, AZ.
Tell me about yourself and the company.
Sunquest is the largest laboratory software company in the world. We provide solutions that enable the full automation of the hospital laboratory and also solutions that extend across the continuum of care to all areas of healthcare where lab tests are ordered, samples are collected, or results are needed to make effective clinical decisions.
They are mission critical because the decisions are made 24/7, so the solutions have to operate 24/7. Around 70% of all clinical decisions are based on lab data.
I?m the president of Sunquest. I?ve held that position for nearly seven years now. Together with the leadership team, we?ve taken Sunquest through a series of transformations and changes of ownership, but always with a focus on creating solutions that add value and result in client delight.
?
Tell me how the acquisition by Roper took place and what changes have been made as a result.
Roper had been looking at Sunquest and the progress that we?d been making in the marketplace for quite a little bit of time. They had approached the shareholders and entered into a conversation with the shareholders about acquiring the business. I think they?d been looking at software companies in general.
They?ve got a very large software presence across a number of industry verticals. They really liked what they saw in Sunquest with our customer base, market share, and transformation we made in the product portfolio. It was a conversation through the investors and the match that Sunquest in its profile had with Roper?s view of where they wanted to invest and how they could grow their business. It became a win-win for both the existing shareholders and for Roper that the acquisition closed.
?
What is most different about being owned by a private equity firm versus being a publicly traded company?
We?re only about two months into the Roper ownership, but I?ve enjoyed each of those phases of the business. When I first joined Sunquest, it was part of the Misys organization, which from the healthcare perspective, became Allscripts. It was part of Misys and then it was a private equity and now it?s with Roper.
Each owner has really helped us in the business focus on how you add value and what you need to grow the business. The questions are essentially the same. How do the shareholders help add value and how do you grow the business?
There?s a view that private equity is short-term focused. That was not my experience. They really focused on growing value in the business. That requires a strategic perspective, not just a short-term one. You don?t grow value because of your short-term focus.
It?s the same so far with Roper. They are publicly traded and there?s a view that publicly traded companies only think quarter to quarter, but all the conversations I?ve had with Roper are about how we are going to grow the business further and how we add value in the marketplace. They are really taking a longer-term view.
I think one of the main differences is, though, that Roper has a track record of owning businesses forever. Their message to employees was that this a permanent home for Sunquest. That?s really how they thought about it. When they did their due diligence, it was on the basis that they were going to own Sunquest forever. That thought about what?s the next step or who?s going to be the next owner for Sunquest has been removed ? it is Roper. They?re a permanent home and we?re focused long-term on growth.
?
Will they be a hands-off owner who is happy with the operation as it stands or do you see them wanting change the strategic direction?
They?re what?s traditionally been called a holding company. Their businesses are all autonomous. They have around 33 businesses and Sunquest will operate autonomously within the Roper family. I continue to be responsible and the leadership team continues to be responsible for direction and running the business.
They clearly as owners ? and they have invested a lot of money here ? have a view as to how they have helped their existing businesses grow, their track records for growth. A lot of that is being focused on globally ? international growth ? and also focused in on ensuring that the channels to market are effective, not just the products. A lot of technology companies are focused on product, but that the channel to market ? the sales channel and the delivery channel ? are also effective.?
The questions that we?re getting are, ?What else do we need to do to drive international growth? Are there any more things that we need to do to be effective in the marketplace with the sales channel and delivery channel?? But otherwise, the leadership team?s all in place, the messages are that everybody is being retained ? there were no synergies from the acquisition that were planned. Everybody has a role and everybody?s being kept in place.
?
Do you think people were surprised that the transaction was for $1.4 billion? That?s a pretty big deal in healthcare IT.
There may been some surprise externally. Internally within the company and with the shareholders, less so. We knew how much value was being created and how much the business is growing.?
I think one of the things that perhaps we?ve failed to do is get our message out as clearly as we could have about how much success we have generated within Sunquest. Order intake is growing consistently in the mid to high teens year over year. That has driven obviously revenue growth. It?s driven the profitability of the business. Sunquest today is a very different organization than it was five years ago when it was acquired by private equity.
We?ve also transformed product development. We?re writing three times the lines of code per year and releasing four times the number of product releases per year that we were five years ago. The products have changed, the organization has changed, and we?ve been growing consistently every year. That represents value.
But I don?t know that we got that message out well enough for all of your readers to say, ?That?s understandable, because Sunquest is on the move.? When you? look at the performance of the business, it?s been on move for five years.
?
The company has stayed focused on lab systems even though you have offerings in radiology and in other areas. Would you still characterize Sunquest as a laboratory information systems vendor and do you see that changing?
Yes, that?s how I?d characterize it at our core. We have other products, but largely what we?ve done is looked at the workflows in and around the laboratory. We think about the lab business as being inside the four walls of the lab and having a comprehensive set of solutions that operate within the four walls. But then looking at the workflows outside of the lab but within the hospital, we?ve got a comprehensive set of solutions that extend those workflows ? to the point of care, to surgery, emergency department, etc. ? and then take those workflows outside to the doctor?s office.
When we looked at that, we saw a huge opportunity for growth. We went about developing those solutions and acquiring some to enable us to fully automate all those workflows associated with the laboratory and laboratory testing, but right across the continuum of care.
Then when you think about anatomic pathology and the opportunities to fully automate anatomic pathology and then move toward digital pathology and the image aspects of digital pathology, we still see this huge amount of opportunity for future growth without having to step outside of this core, very deep focus that we have in and around the lab.
?
What do you think is on the radar for genetic testing being used by hospitals and practices, and how might Sunquest fit?
We?re spending a lot of our time and focus and investment in and around not just genetic testing, but the things that can enable the opportunity to move from healthcare being focused on the treatment of acute illness and diagnosis to move towards prognosis and then potential for prevention. Diagnosis, prognosis, to prevention.?
Our view is that genomics and genetic testing is going to be one of the enablers to be able to move in that continuum. That to my mind is going to enable the fundamental transformation of healthcare. I know there?s different views as to either when that could occur or the impact it will have, but I do think that that transition will occur and that in the future, we?ll have a very different view of what healthcare really means ? that it?s not just about the treatment of illness.
?
I?m hearing that Epic?s Beaker LIS product is coming along fairly strongly, especially in the anatomic pathology areas, and of course Cerner and Meditech and other vendors offer a full line of products that include a laboratory information system. What do you think is the future for best-of-breed LIS products?
I think it?s very strong, as evidenced by the growth that we?ve already exhibited in the last five years. During the time when there was a lot of focus on the enterprise and Meaningful Use, etc. we?ve been growing very substantially.
The way I view this is there is so much complexity in and around the lab and there?s so much opportunity still to fully automate that area. That really does require a deep understanding of the workflows and a deep understanding of the needs in that area. I do not personally see the compromise that comes from an enterprise or a ?one size fits all? approach in and around the lab.
One thing that?s very high on my agenda is the focus on quality in healthcare and quality in terms also of software solutions. Whether software solutions such as the ones Sunquest and our competitors provide are already medical devices. There seems to be a lot of discussion about that.
I am firm believer and an advocate of the fact that the types of solutions that we provide and the software solutions that are used in the enterprise are medical devices. If they?re not, I don?t know what other definition you could apply. These are clearly products that are used to help improve the effectiveness of healthcare, to help provide information that enables physicians and others to make clinical decisions.?
I?m a strong believer that these are medical devices. I really don?t understand the position that others seem to take that they?re not medical devices, and therefore they should not be subject to things like FDA review. I take a contrary view to most of my colleagues on that.
?
Supposedly the vendors convinced the FDA years ago that it would police itself without FDA involvement. FDA seems to be signaling at least some level of interest, which might be a positive development for companies like Sunquest that already have experience in working under FDA?s guidelines. Do you see FDA?s view changing?
I don?t whether the view will change. I agree with you ? there seems to be some dialogue occurring, but perhaps going a little softly on that is to whether they would really get into this area. I know there?s a lot of discussion, but I don?t know whether they will change their view.
I do think it would good for Sunquest. We have blood bank products that are classified as medical devices. We?ve chosen to register virtually every product we?ve got as a medical device. We are subject to FDA audits, and we see that as a positive as opposed to a negative.?
On our last FDA audit, we had zero observations. That?s a pretty high standard that we set. We also had zero observations from our ISO audit. We see a robust quality system, repeatable and demonstrable process documentation, and adherence as a core of delivering high-quality solutions that operate as advertised. We see the benefit to the business. We would see it as a benefit, of course, if others were asked to perform to the same high standard.
?
A lot of healthcare IT software companies operate more like they?re selling general business software. They don?t have the ISO certification and they don?t want any part of FDA oversight. In your mind, would patients be safer if both of those were standards for companies that sell software that impacts patient care?
Well, I don?t know if I would go there because I?m not sure. I can?t really talk to any other companies in how they validate that their products are high quality. I just know that in our case, we use the quality system and the compliance to the ISO standards and validation requirements ? we?ve got a number of ISO certifications ? and the FDA audit.
We use those as a guide post to having a quality system, which is a core business system within the company. I feel a lot more comfortable and I can sleep a lot more soundly knowing that we have a very, very robust quality system ? that third parties audit and concur that its is a very solid system ? and that we are operating very effectively to that system. Then we can demonstrate that the quality of the solution is to a very high standard as well.
?
You mentioned Meaningful Use. What parts of it do you think are most relevant to laboratory information systems?
There are several areas. In Stage 1, they were in the optional list. Stage 2 is moving them into core. If and when Stage 3 gets finalized, they?ll all be core.?
There?s a number of different things like reportable results, which sounds pretty straightforward, but we?ve been interfacing out to the CDC and others to provide reportable results for years. Even some of our competitors with lab solutions find that difficult. To do that out of an enterprise solution is extremely difficult. The lab has the very granular information that we can utilize to move the right results to the right place.?
There are a number of different things, but I think reportable results is one of them. With Stage 2, it?s going to get increasingly important.
Then we have LOINC, which is to enable information to be shared. Again, there?s a lot of detail around LOINC and lab-to-lab and enterprise-to-enterprise communications. I believe the best-of-breed lab solutions provider is best positioned to meet that need and to be able to provide those solutions.
?
I?m curious ? do you have any idea what percentage of hospitals are using best-of-breed laboratory information systems?
I can only guess. My guess is over 50 percent.
?
Where did your past growth come from and where do you see it coming from in the future?
It?s probably several areas. As we?ve invested and expanded our portfolio, there?s growth around what the laboratory calls outreach. It is really connectivity to the physician office and enabling physicians in the community to have meaningful interactions with the lab ? easy ordering, rapid results, effective management of the samples into the lab. We have an outreach suite, which enables the lab to manage those relationships on an effective business professional level. That?s been an area of growth.
Within the hospital, automating the workflows back from the point of care ? when lab tests are ordered, samples collected, and results come back. We?ve got solutions that have been demonstrated by our customers to eliminate error in those processes. That?s been a significant area of growth.
The other is we have a large footprint. As networks standardize, they standardize on Sunquest for their lab within the footprint. We have a lot of additional hospitals that convert to Sunquest within our base, but it?s the new hospitals that have converted to Sunquest that?s been part of our growth.
Then these applications in anatomic pathology ? automation of anatomic pathology, sample management in anatomic pathology.?
There?s a fairly broad swath of solutions that have represented that growth.
?
A fair amount of the interest in the interoperability side is either preventing ordering of duplicate tests or doing alerting on abnormal results. Do you see a lot going on, or do you hand off to other systems for that?
No, we have those solutions. We do that. We?re constantly enhancing the solutions with new releases and new versions. Those things you mentioned we?ve considered as core capabilities for a best-of-breed lab solution for many years.
?
Are you expecting or experiencing international growth?
Yes. We?re expecting and experiencing international growth ? both of the above.
We?ve made an acquisition in the UK. We?ve got a great solution over there which does a lot of what you?ve just asked about ? alerting about orders and resulting. It?s in use by 65 percent of the national health hospitals in the UK and nearly 50 percent of the doctors? offices use that particular solution.?
We have around 300,000 users in the UK, but we?re also expanding internationally, putting more resources in. We recently added new customers in Australia and we?re looking for further expansion in the international marketplace.
?
Any concluding thoughts?
We?ve been very successful. We?re growing and we?ve also created a lot of value, but I think that value is really reflected in the solutions and in the quality of the solutions that we provide. I feel very fortunate to be in the position I?m in and to have had the opportunity to take some steps forward in this way.
Source: http://histalk2.com/2012/11/09/histalk-interviews-richard-atkin-president-and-ceo-sunquest/
pipa keystone xl sopa bill sopa and pipa piracy sopa marg helgenberger
Source: http://feeds.celebritybabies.com/~r/celebrity-babies/~3/2Of4bwGC55s/
tuskegee airmen mike james red tails red tails heidi klum heidi klum red tails trailer
The third largest U.S. wireless carrier will soon have a new owner. Japan-based Softbank has announced plans to purchase a 70 percent share of Sprint Nextel for approximately $20.1 billion.
According to a Reuters report by Mari Saito and Tim Kelly the $20.1 billion price tag sets a record as "the most a Japanese firm has spent on an overseas acquisition."
CNBC's David Faber reported, "The transaction calls for Softbank to buy $8 billion worth of shares directly from Sprint at a price of $5.25 each and tender for another $12 billion worth of the shares from existing holders at a price of $7.30 a share, a large premium to Sprint's current price. Given the deal's structure, it will not require a shareholder vote."
The Wall Street Journal's Daisuke Wakabayashi And Kana Inagaki noted, "The deal would transform Softbank, a relative newcomer in the telecommunications industry, into one of the world's largest telecom groups with about 90 million subscribers when combined with Sprint. It expects to complete the deal by mid-2013."
In The New York Times, Michael J. de la Merced and Neil Gough observed, "Shares in Sprint have risen 14 percent since the wireless company confirmed on Thursday that it was in negotiations with SoftBank, closing at $5.73 on Friday."
top model all stars americas next top model mark buehrle mark buehrle rick perry ad rick perry ad dragnet
The Xperia Tablet S may be the new kid on the block, but Sony hasn't forgotten about the original Tablet S. U.S. owners of the original 'folded magazine' style Tablet S should be starting to see an Android 4.0.3 based update that brings some of the features of the newer tablet.
First up is guest mode. For many, the ability to share a single tablet, and restrict access to certain features, apps, as well as having personalizations for each person is a much desired feature. The Xperia Tablet S comes with the feature out of the box, and is sure to be a welcome addition to the Tablet S.
Also worth noting is the arrival of the new media applications from Sony. The Walkman, Movies and Album apps have all been updated visually and come packed with some new features.
The small apps too gets a boost, with the addition of some extra windows that you're able to overlay. And, widgets can be registered and utilised as small apps too. Handy for popping up your GMail perhaps while playing a little Crash Bandicoot.
The OTA update is pushing out now, so if you've yet to see a notification be sure to head into your Settings>About>System Updates to manually check. For the full rundown be sure to hit up the source link below, and head into the comments and tell us your thoughts if you've already downloaded.
Source: Sony
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/androidcentral/~3/iSUGR7VtxMo/story01.htm
desean jackson kyle orton kyle orton ncaa tournament schedule